About 900g fat in two weeks ...!? Relationship between processed food and obesity · US research results

About 900g fat in two weeks ...!? Relationship between processed food and obesity · US research results..

Because it is easy. Bothersome. tired. no time. The refrigerator is empty.

There are various reasons for not cooking and relying on processed foods.

Examine the relationship between processed food and obesity

It is a convenient processed food, but it seems that there are various problems in that it becomes the center of the diet.

The National Institutes of Health in the American Power of Obesity provides the body with a diet of ultra processed foods and an unprocessed diet with minimally processed foods and whole foods. Examined the impact and compared.

The contents of the experiment are ...

Well, the experiment was like this.

-A total of 20 subjects, including 10 healthy men and women who maintain a constant weight.

He lives for four weeks at the National Institutes of Health, and eats processed and non-processed foods every two weeks. It was decided to eat as much food as I wanted.

The contents of calories, carbohydrates, proteins, fibers, fats, salts, sugars, etc. were set the same for both diets.

・ Subject's calorie consumption, blood sugar level and hormone level were also measured.

・ Example of super-processed food diet: Chicken salad with canned chicken ・ Canned syruped peaches.

Examples of non-processed food meals: stir-fried vegetables and beef, rice, sliced ​​oranges.

We understand why processed food leads to overeating

As a result, in the diet of processed food, you also ate an average of 508 calories a day on average, and gained about 900 g in average over two weeks! Conversely, it seems that about 900 g of non-processed food was reduced.

Kevin Hall of the National Institutes of Health, who led the study, paid particular attention to changes in hormone levels with diet. In a super-processed food diet, subjects' hunger hormone levels increased and satiety hormones dropped.

On the other hand, in the non-processed food diet, on the other hand, hungry hormones dropped and full hormones rose.

In other words, processed foods have less feeling of fullness. I also have experience with this! In an easy lunch with only processed foods, such as energy bars and warm soups, you often feel that you will not feel hungry immediately even if you eat hard.

I thought it was because I was eating fast when I was hungry, but there was a deeper reason that the level of hormones was greatly influenced by what I ate.

Is protein intake the key?

Also, I was interested in the news of this research result is the concept of "protein leverage hypothesis". Could you say it as a protein-tech hypothesis or a protein influence hypothesis? It is said that people eat until they can consume the required amount of protein.

The amount of protein consumed by the subjects was almost the same for both diets. So, in the NPR article, "In the diet of processed foods, you may be taking more carbohydrates and fats until you can consume the amount of protein you need."

If so, should you eat protein first in any diet? I tend to stick to fats, carbohydrates and calories, but now I'm going to be conscious of protein intake.

I want to use processed food wisely

It was vaguely understood that it was better to eat a meal prepared from raw materials as much as possible than processed food, but it was important not only for weight maintenance but also for hormone levels, which had a major impact.

In our lives it is impossible not to rely on processed food at all. So I want to use it cleverly without relying too much on processed food. For that, this article will be helpful.